‘Fly Me To The Moon’ director Greg Berlanti: ‘Scarlett Johansson and her team sent the script to me’

2 months ago 35

“I loved that a movie star actually wanted to do an original story in this day and age for the big screen. And so we jumped right in,” said the director read more

 ‘Scarlett Johansson and her team sent the script to me’

How did you find out about the story? What did you think about the script and what made you want to be part of it?

GREG BERLANTI:  Scarlett Johansson and her company sent it to me. I had met with Scarlett about another project, and we had stayed friendly, creatively. And they sent me the script, and they said, we hope you like it. We need a director. We’re going in three or four months. And I read it, and I knew right away that I was in love with the story. I loved that a movie star actually wanted to do an original story in this day and age for the big screen. And so we jumped right in.

QUESTION:  What was special about this story that made you want to direct it, rather than produce like you more often do?

GREG BERLANTI:    I’m not a director by nature. I don’t wake up every day thinking oh, what am I going to direct today?You know, I love stories and so I get drawn into certain stories that I feel I would want to see on TV or I would want to see in the movies. And this reminded me of all the movies that I went to as a kid in the seventies and eighties that was just a big screen movie star movie with an original, fun, smart, blend of tones. I loved NASA as a kid. I think I grew up in a generation whereeverybody still knew the name of all the Apollo astronauts. And there was a real love for what that stood for in American history.

And so that was an amazing opportunity, too. I had watched all the NASA documentaries through the years and really fell in love with the possibility of being a part of retelling one of those stories for the right reasons. And then the last thing I’d say is that its a big, fun, entertaining movie, but it was really about something, as well. It was about why the truth is important. And I think in this day and age, that’s a great story to be a part of.


QUESTION:  Can you tell us more about the story?

GREG BERLANTI:    It’s 1969 and America is caught up in the great space race versus the Soviet Union. A New York marketing exec is brought in by the government to rehabilitate NASA’s image because America was losing a little bit of faith in the program because of things like Vietnam and other events that were drawing their attention. And people didn’t think we were necessarily going to make it to the moon by the end of the decade. So, Kelly Jones, played by the wonderful Scarlett Johansson, is brought in to rehabilitate NASAs image, but is told halfway through the movie by her government handler that she actually now has to work to fake the moon landing while everyone else is working on the real moon landing.

QUESTION:    Can you tell us a little bit more about Kelly?

GREG BERLANTI:    Kelly’s played by Scarlett Johansson andshe is a whip smart New York marketing exec with a bit of a past, though we don’t know what that is. She is brought in by Moe, who’s a shadowy person working for a shadowy government agency, played by Woody Harrelson, and he’s brought her in to rehabilitate the image of NASA. In doing that, she conceives of this possibility of how to fake the moon landing. And so at the center of it, you have this love story between a man working on the real moon landing and a woman working on the fake moon landing at the same time.

QUESTION:  Let’s talk about Cole and why he’s so passionate about his NASA project. When Kelly comes in, why does it upend his world?

GREG BERLANTI:    Cole is played by Channing Tatum and he is a true blue American, a man who’s served his country his entire life. As part of that, he represents the half million Americans that worked on the Apollo mission. They couldn’t afford to make a single mistake or a single error. And he was, in his time, representative of the people that were focused just on the mission and not on the sales part of it. But what I always like to say about the Apollo mission at the time was that it took both;It took a bullshit artist, when Kennedy said we’re going to the moon, there was no evidence that we could get there in a decade, but he believed. And it took the individuals that worked every day, inside and out, to achieve that dream.

So he represents, obviously, the truth, and represents theintegrity, and belief and what people are actually capable of, and that really changes Kelly when she gets there. Part of her arc is going from this person who thinks everybody’s telling a story and everybody’s selling something to a person who thinks differently.

QUESTION:  Can you talk a little bit about Jim, about Anna, and the rest of the cast?

GREG BERLANTI: So we have Ruby, Kelly’s assistant, played by Anna Garcia. Shes her aide de camp, you know, her sidekick. And shes also representative of young people in that era who are a lot like the young people today who want to change things. Who feel like the old ways don’t work. So she’s a breath of fresh air going in and is also emotionally there for Kelly throughout. And she sees the change in Kelly and is on that journey with her. I think she adores and respects her boss so much, but then also sees the price of the lie that they’re working on together.

Jim Rash plays Lance Vespertine who’s the director of the fake moon landing. he’s brought in by Kelly and hes I think - very representative of a lot of directors. Maybe some people thought that there were some similarities between myself and him, but certainly similar to lot of individuals I’ve met in the business through the years who are higher strung but very talented and have a real vision for how to pull it off.

Part of the fun of the movie was that we weren’t trying to just make fun of faking the moon landing, but really trying to envision how that would be possible in 1969 with 1969 technology. And so a lot of the conversations we were having as filmmakers working on the movie, our characters also had to have. Jim is an amazing improv artist, also, so he was able to generate stuff off the cuff that I would just try and capture on a regular basis. We would spit ball with each other in that way.

Woody Harrelson plays Moe. Obviously, Woody’s an icon. He can play Moe as the kind of character you adore at first and then he can shift as there’s a twist to his character, later in the picture.

And then you have to like him again by the end. So in imagining what actor could set the stakes for a movie like this, of this size, and also still have a fiendish element, but also a funny elementand be so likable throughout, there’s really almost no one other than Woody Harrelson that could pull off something like that. And I think he just does it brilliantly. He’s one of the great actors of his generation.

Then there is Ray Romano, who I pursued heavily to play Henry in this. I’ve always wanted to work with Ray. I think he represents so many of the people who also worked on the program, like everyday Americans.

And he’s so much the heart and soul, I think, of NASA in this. He’s very much a father figure to Channing’s character and their interplay just gives a real dynamic element to both of those people as well.

QUESTION:    Can you talk about the characters and their chemistry on screen?

GREG BERLANTI:    You know when you work with stars of this magnitude, who are stars for a reason, they each have afilmic element that most people don’t have. And you do wonder, until they’re in a room together and I’m watching them act together, do they have chemistry that makes me want to go, oh, what’s going to happen for them? And, I knew from our first rehearsal. We did about three or four days of rehearsal because I wanted everybody to be comfortable with the script and a lot of things come up in the rehearsal process that you can figure out before the day of shooting, when you’ve got limited light or limited time. They were so inventive and fun with each other.

As the young people say, it was giving Rock Hudson and DorisDay. It was giving Spencer Tracy and Hepburn. They each have their own brand of comedy and their own brand of drama, but they really fit well together. And in a million years, you may never put the two of them together, but then after they’re together, you’re like, of course. I think they have that quality, and it was just fun and exciting to see what was going to happen every day. Then my job just becomes about not letting them bump into furniture, and just making sure that everybody’s just enjoying themselves.

QUESTION:  This movie has high stakes, but there are also comedic moments in it. Can you talk about directing those moments and how you balance those elements?

GREG BERLANTI:  Yeah, the tone of the movie was one of the trickier things, but it was also the thing that attracted me to the movie from day one. Just to know that we’re going to go to the moon in this movie and we’re going to walk on the moon in this movie, but we’re also going to have a lot of fun interplay between the characters while it happens. That’s where it really reminded me of so many movies that I grew up with from Working Girls to Tootsie that were workplace stories that had stakes, but were also heightened and fun for the audience. I think that’s so much about your actors. It really is about who you cast in those parts. I knew right from the start to work with someone as incredibly talented as Scarlett and that the breadth of her abilities, which are so vast, would just totally set the tone.

And then Channing came on and you know he’s his own comedic and dramatic force and that would add an element. And then every layer we tried to add with each of the actors, every day I want to wake up and I get to work with Ray Romano today. I get to work with Jim Rash today. I get to work with Scarlett and Channing today. And there are going to be those surprises that they’re going to bring you, and you just try and create an environment for them to do that. And then if you’re doing it consistently throughout, you make sure the script’s where it needs to be for that, and you make sure the scenes and the days are there for that. At the end, you have this treasure trove of stuff and then it’s just about, layering it and putting it in the right order and should a laugh come here because the dramatic part came here? and how quickly can you shift that tone for the audience?

I think music’s a big part of being able to do that and I think its a day-by-day thing. It goes all the way from the beginning of the first draft of the script all the way through to the last cut and every time you’re showing it to a different audience, and what are you learning about the film then. Thats sort of how the tone is done. It’s not really done with one wide brush. It’s done in these little nuances throughout. But you need the actors. The dream of this was the talent that I got to work with.

QUESTION:    Can you tell us about the setting of the movie and the production design and just recreating the era from the costumes, the hairstyle, etc.?

GREG BERLANTI:    I had never done a period movie before. I mean, I had made movies long ago, but they weren’t period at the time. They’re period now when you watch them, but I had never done a period film. And so I was also nervous about thatbut also excited like, how am I going to do that? It really isall in the details. Its really about the crew that you step up with and how much you communicate across all different departments about what we’re going for in this moment. We had as our touchstones a lot of actual footage from the Apollo mission, some of which had not even been restored that we restored for the film and we knew we were going to commingle with our footage throughout.

So that started to determine how we’re going to shoot the movie. Dariusz Wolski is a legend and I think one of the most talented and most well-respected Directors of Photography. He actually plays our DP, Edvard, in the movie because I kept hearing him talk about what we were going to do and then I would be auditioning these DPs during the day and I was like, they sound silly. You sound like the real thing. So much of the movie - without giving away the ending - builds up to the question of what’s real and what’s fake, and so, you know, if you’re going to fake something, and you want it to feel real. You need the whole movie to feel real.

Dariusz is just a genius and knew what lenses to shoot on and what moments to focus on and talked a great deal about that and then we communicated that with production design and Mary Zophres, who is also a legend, who did our costumes. And you can see she’s done everything from Catch Me If You Can to First Man, so she’s done many, many things in that era and in that moment. It just brought its own vitality to this and all those outfits that Scarlett’s wearing. Each thing is sort of its own delight. I think part of the fun of doing something in ‘69 is making people want to feel like they could live back there.

And then the production design department would come up with these concept images that we spent a lot of time on. We recreated the entire firing room, which is the launch room at Cape Kennedy. We shot at Cape Kennedy for a week. We shot in Savannah to capture a lot of exteriors in Cape Kennedy for about a week, and then the rest we did in Atlanta in the winter. So the fact that the movie feels like it’s 1969 in the summer was like also one of the things we were really focused on.

QUESTION:  Can we talk about shooting in Georgia? Why did you choose Georgia and why is it so great to shoot there?

GREG BERLANTI:    I’ve shot, this is my third film I’ve shot in Georgia. I love shooting in Georgia. My family was there with me. I love the communities. I love the film crews. It’s affordable and I think when doing a movie of this scope and size, you really want to know where we are spending the money. For instance, we spent the most amount of money on the firing room that we recreated. All the videos that were on screen in that room were what exactly was playing on the moment of the launch. We actually had the room on shakers so that it shook, as that room shook, which is only a couple miles from the launch site.

So we let the extras and everybody really experience the launch right from the very beginning. We played it just a few times for them so everyone was in this kind of spiritual moment, and I think there really is something spiritual about those kind of things. The moon set, you know, to create a moon set that you could actually recreate the moon landing on, you need a vast amount of space, as we have here, and an even deeper backdrop, so that the stars would fall off as they would. You almost need a baseball field size. And we were able to get a stage that was about that big just for all the moon walk stuff. So there are a lot of elements that we were able to achieve there, but I would do another film in Atlanta in a second. I had a great time there.

QUESTION:    Why do people need to see this in a theater?

GREG BERLANTI:    For years now, I feel like everyone has been asking for more original stories, rather than just sequels or stories based on other things. And so from the outset, when Scarlett was throwing her weight as a producer and an actor behind this original story, I was so excited to be a part of it. When I was growing up, every weekend you could go to a movie where you didn’t know what was going to happen, you know? And I think the ability to go in, experience this, take a trip back in time is rewarding for an audience.


The big-screenness of it is what was accomplished at that time. It wasn’t red or blue. It was everyone working together. You know, a friend of mine said to me after seeing it, it’s the kind of movie we used to make about the kinds of things we used to do. And that’s how I feel about the film. I want this nation to be a part of doing more impossible things. So, we made a fun movie about that, that hopefully will entertain people.

QUESTION:  Can you tell us about the cat in the film?

GREG BERLANTI:  So I’m allergic to cats. And when I saw that there was a cat in the movie it didn’t make me not want to do the movie, but I thought this is going to be interesting. Of course, there’s a cat in this movie. How am I going to deal with this? I worked with not just one cat, but three cats to achieve the cat in this film. And it’s never CG’d. The only time we used CG around it is one or two times when we had to elevate him high up and we didn’t want to put the cat in that circumstance. But it’s always a real cat in the movie. And these cats were amazing. They were so smart. I’m not going to say they were the easiest actors to deal with on the movie because I wouldn’t want to offend the other actors, but they were pretty great. The cat has a lot of personality. There was a teeny bit more of it in the original story, in the original cut.

But I think there’s just the right amount of cat in the film. One could say that the cat is kind of like Kelly, you know. She’s somewhat mysterious. And I think even musically there’s asimilar connection between the two of them and its fun. It reminded me of the kind of that Blake Edwards kind of vibe from the late sixties, early seventies films, you know? And I think it was done right and is a wonderful treat and surprise for the audience. And, of course, it builds to something thathopefully nobody sees coming.

QUESTION:  Tell us about the music, the feeling of being in the sixties. What went into those decisions?

GREG BERLANTI:  So there were two elements to the music:First, there’s the music that’s from the sixties. I started right away with Season Kent, who I’ve worked with many, many times across shows and other films, just developing a musical language. I wanted music from the sixties that we haven’t heard in a million shows and movies. And I wanted that kind of soundtrack that when you got to the end you’re like, oh, wow, that’s a great song and that’s a great song and that’s undiscovered and that’s undiscovered so that the moments in the film wouldn’t feel like retreads of other movies. So she would send list after list of song after song. And she was still in the end finding songs that I was like, oh, wow, I haven’t heard that one. Let’s try that one.

So that was, that was going on for months and deep into prep all the way through the end. And then Daniel Pemberton is just a genius. You know, he really is who he is for a reason. And stylistically, because the film has a blend of tones, we have some jazz in there. We have orchestral stuff around parts of the NASA. We have electronic music around the moon and those elements and they all have to feel of a piece, you know. They all have to feel like one. There’s, there’s so much nuance and layering that went into all of that by him. And I just love his themes and the romantic themes and the emotional themes and the fun themes. It was just sort of fun to watch him create.

I am not cool myself, so if you’re going to try and do a moviethat’s cool, you have to hire a lot of cool people around you. And each department head that I work with really has their own aesthetic and their own brilliance. And it becomes about trying to encourage those people and communicating what you’re trying to say with those moments, but the genius is theirs.

QUESTION:  You’re making a movie about recreating the moon landing, but you have to recreate the recreation of the moon landing. So what was that like, trying to build that set?

GREG BERLANTI:    I had the combo platter of feeling very daunted by that because when I grew up, those things were myths to me like larger than life. The very first photo I bought for my son’s room was an image of Neil Armstrong suit when it was taken off of him, and it was the very first thing I put up in my son’s room years ago before I ever came on to a movie like this. So its just part of both the American myth and one of ourgreatest stories ever told. Maybe it’s arguably the greatest human accomplishment ever that was achieved by these men.

So we wanted to honor all that throughout, but then we also had to achieve what would it have meant to have faked all that and to do that in a way that’s equally realistic. And so from day one in prep, months before we started shooting, we were watching the two and a half hour footage, on loop. And we had stunt choreographers map out every single step that was taken. And so even though there was only five or six minutes of it in the movie, we shot all two and a half hours of everything that happened on the moon surface from almost every angle. We even went through a hundred samples of grains of sand, just so that we could get the right moon dust when you stepped on it.

So it was little details like that to obviously the reconstruction of the LEM. We had a few LEMs because we have a training LEM that we’re in at one period. Then we have the LEM that’s on the fake moon set. We had to shoot all the moon stuff backwards because it was easier to disassemble the set than it was to reassemble it. So there was that element to it. And then there’s the element of figuring out how we’re going to shoot it in a way that the audience understands conceptually whats going on. That was always in the draft right from the very first script I read by Rose Gilroy, who’s so incredibly talented as a writer. Was this piece de resistance of this third act that was like, is it fake? Is it real? Is it fake? Is it real?

There was the actual coverage of what was happening on the moon. And we use almost all in camera stuff. So we got real cameras from the era. That’s what’s playing on the stage. That’s what’s playing on the broadcast. So we shot it for real. We shot it for real in that era. We shot it for real if it was news footage in that era. It’s all sort of contained. It was a million conversations in prep and in production and in post.

It was a mission! There was a lot that went into it. No day was the same on the set.

Read Entire Article